BitcoDavid is a blogger and a blog site consultant. In former lives, he was an audio engineer, a videographer, a teacher – even a cab driver. He is an avid health and fitness enthusiast and an Pro/Am boxer. He has spent years working with diet and exercise to combat obesity and obesity related illness.
On June 1st, 2010 Justice Kennedy delivered the Court’s ruling in Burghuis vs. Thomkins 560 U.S. __, No. 08-1470. The case involved Van C. Thompkins Jr., who remained mostly silent during a three-hour interrogation, but finally confessed to the killing of Samuel Morris. Thompkins’ confession was used against him at his trial, which ended with a conviction of first-degree murder.
Thompkins appealed using the fact that he had initially opted to remain silent, but police continued to interrogate him. An appeals court, in 2008, agreed with him.
But the SCOTUS ruled against him, stating that it is not only necessary to remain silent, but that you need to state verbally – at the onset of the interrogation – that you wish to exercise that right. It would be similar to invoking your 5th amendment rights. In other words, it is necessary to reply – to each question – when taking the fifth, “I refuse to answer on the grounds my answer may incriminate me.”
Alright, McGillicuddy. Did ya kill that nun? I refuse to answer under my Miranda rights. You’re goin’ to take the spike for this, McGillicuddy. I refuse to answer under my Miranda rights. McGillicuddy? Do you believe in God? I refuse to answer under my Miranda rights. What about your family? Do they know what a scumbag you are? I refuse to answer under my Miranda rights.
You get the idea.
Here’s the PDF of the SCOTUS ruling.
Here’s a link that explains all the legal ins and outs.
And here’s one from our side:
- What does placing your signature on the Miranda Waiver Really Mean? (deafinprison.wordpress.com)
- Know Your Rights … (point4counterpoint.wordpress.com)
- Understanding and Exercising Miranda Rights (lorilaird.wordpress.com)
- George Whitmore Dead at 68 (deafinprison.wordpress.com)
- When do Miranda Rights need to be read? (ask.metafilter.com)
- Judge Rules Defense Can Use Trayvon Martin Tweets (yro.slashdot.org)
- Stress and Understanding Miranda Rights (drvitelli.typepad.com)
- Kamisar on Miranda v. Arizona (lsolum.typepad.com)
- Florida to Execute Schizophrenic “Prince of God” (deafinprison.wordpress.com)
- US Judge Holds That Paranoid Schizophrenic Beliefs Are Identical to Christianity (theageofblasphemy.wordpress.com)
11 thoughts on “Supreme Court Rewrites Miranda Warning”
Reblogged this on Point4CounterPoint.
Thank you for reblogging DeafInPrison.com. Again, we appreciate your support.
Reblogged this on http://www.HumansinShadow.wordpress.com.
Thank you again, Coalition for Human Rights Movement. We work hard – as do you – and no compliment is higher than being reblogged by one’s peers.
Reblogged this on The Coalition for Human Rights Movement.
HumansinShadow – you’re awesome! It makes us so proud that you reblog our work.